For generations of players, Rounders is practically a sacred movie. Released in 1998, it helped build part of the modern mystique of poker and turned Mike McDermott
But there is a small problem: seen from another perspective, its ending can be quite unsettling.
Mike loses $30,000 against Teddy KGB, promises to quit poker, returns to playing, destroys his relationship, and ends up risking borrowed money to face again the man who had previously left him without a bankroll. He finally wins, pays his debts, and regains control. Then comes the scene that still divides opinions: he gets into a taxi and heads to Las Vegas to play the WSOP.
The movie presents that moment practically as a liberation.
But is it?
The film critic himself Roger Ebert
Read more Travel with CodigoTravel to the BSOP Millions: unmissable promotions and free stay — CodigoPoker
Rounders Is Practically A Sacred Poker Movie.
However, there is a completely opposite interpretation.
Mike does not end up being the same player who started the movie. Against Teddy, he shows patience, discipline, and the ability to control his impulses. From that perspective, poker would not be his disease, but his profession. The real conflict would have been trying to live a life —Law, partner, and stability— designed around what others expected of him.
There lies the brilliant trap that Rounders left set. If Mike had lost again to Teddy, we would probably be talking about a story about addiction. Since he won, we talk about chasing dreams.
But does a victory really change the problem?
Almost three decades later, Rounders still does not answer it. And perhaps that is why his last taxi ride continues to be one of the most discussed hands that were never played on a poker table.
Check out more of this interesting analysis proposed by the Youtube channel Poker Bounty in their latest video:
Read more United States took a firm first step against the tax law affecting players — CodigoPoker
